CAMPUS ALERT

Bellevue University Tops U.S. News Rankings

Critical Thinking Rubric

5. Master Thinker

  • Risks trying to answer intractable, perplexing, and complicated questions
  • Reinterprets the history of thought in the relevant area
  • Redefines the assumptions and premises from which all valid reasoning must proceed in the relevant area
  • Creates an original synthesis of diverse perspectives
  • Reaches conclusions that others acknowledge as foundational for all subsequent reasoning in the relevant area

4. Advanced Thinker

  • Tackles questions that arise from profound cognitive dissonance
  • Challenges conventional, received wisdom responsibly in search of new perspectives
  • Reaches original conclusions through creative and imaginative lines of reasoning; draws vital distinctions and creates new categories
  • Internalizes contrary positions; makes the arguments of opponents for them
  • Actively cooperates or collaborates with others to test and expand the universe of knowledge

3. Practicing Thinker

  • Seeks the most reasonable among the several reasonable answers possible
  • Delays judgment until all of the relevant information is known and assessed; admits ignorance when necessary
  • Constructs sound lines of reasoning based on a fair and accurate assessment of the evidence; examines his or her own presuppositions and assumptions
  • Concedes points to those with opposing positions
  • Believes all sides should recognize his or her attempt to be reasonable and fair

2. Beginning Thinker

  • Seeks to justify his or her position rationally
  • Accepts any information that supports his or her position, regardless of quality
  • Presupposes the truth of the conclusion to be reached; employs logical fallacies
  • Dismisses opposing points of view after only cursory examination
  • Believes that, given the same evidence, all reasonable people should arrive at the same conclusions; those who disagree are unreasonable or worse

Egocentric Thinker

  • Believes there is no single right answer to any question; each person must discover what’s right for him or her
  • Relies on limited facts and information
  • Offers personal opinions only; little or no evidence of reasoning
  • Ignores contrary points of view
  • Does not attempt to persuade others because all are entitled to their own opinion

Based, in part, on Paul & Elder (1999). Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking. Foundation for Critical Thinking.

Thanks for your interest in Bellevue University.

When you click the submit button below, our staff will contact you within 48 hours to get you the information you need and answer any questions.

Yes No